This blog provides commentary by the author, a New Jersey attorney. By using this Blog you agree that the information on this blog does not constitute legal or professional advice and no attorney-client or other relationship is created. Each case has its own particular facts and issues, and this blog should not be relied upon as a substitute for independent legal advice. The laws in your state may be different than anything suggested in this blog. The adequacy, completeness, currency or accuracy of the content is neither warranted nor guaranteed. Your use of the information on this blog or materials linked from it is at your own risk. Nothing in this blog is intended to be a statement of position applicable to any particular case the author may be involved in. Always seek advice of a qualified attorney licensed in your area. There is no substitute for good, experienced, personal legal advice.







Wednesday, November 30, 2011

The Science behind the fallibility of memory

We all know that memory is fickle. We have all heard about people falsely convicted based on eye-witness testimony. Any attorney who has tried a case with witnesses knows that what one remembers and what actually happens do not always coincide.

This fascinating article from the New York Times tells us more about how this works and how our memory plays tricks on us. I found it fascinating. I hope you do too. I plan to keep a copy for future reference.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/29/health/the-certainty-of-memory-has-its-day-in-court.html?_r=1

No comments:

Post a Comment